Nicholas explains in this essay that about how rough labor standards
can be. He states the problem is that "it’s like a vision on
hell" saying that the way life is being lived is not worth nothing, but
something to some people. People are trying so desperately to survive off of very
little. His purpose of this essay is to get the reader to identify how people
are actually considering sweatshops as a job and a safe escape out of poverty.
He appeals to pathos by saying " a woman hopes her 10 years old boy,
scavenging beside her grows up to get a factory job, because she has seen other
kids get ran over by garbage trucks". Basically saying that some people
don't have a choice of a better life, a factory job is what they only see
as a real future for their families. Nicholas states " sweatshops are only
a symptom of poverty, not a cause" because it’s better than not
just being productive at all, when at least you can have a low paying job
with its difficulties, than just straight struggling on your own. The main
argument in this essay is " labor standards can improve wages and working
conditions, without greatly affecting the eventual retail cost of good"
however the countries with less resources can only improve labor standards
based on how production is progressing. He concludes by making the
point that it’s not about what America wants, sweatshops could please the
poverty in certain countries because their living standards won’t allow them to
be as successful in life as how they want to be. Explaining that
sweatshops could be the only answer or for progression for people who feel like
their stuck at the bottom. Overall the argument is effective because it’s well-intended
that people need sweatshops despite all of the issues a sweatshop
has.
She starts if off by introducing who wrote the essay and what the problem is. Covers the who problem and explains exactly what is going on. She points out the main idea of the essay and provides examples through the evidence. There are examples of pathos from the author that appeal to audience. She expresses how the author feels about the topic and provides her opinion as well It is very organized and follows the format and she does include a concluding statement.
ReplyDeleteLevel 4 she covered everything for a rhetorical analysis and has a lot of good evidence.
She has all of her introduction and includes the name and author. she explains that the problem is that the way life is being lived is not worth nothing, but something to some people. She points out the main idea of the essay and provides examples through the evidence on how poorer countries envy the sweatshops we have. There are examples of pathos from the author by saying " a woman hopes her 10 years old boy, scavenging beside her grows up to get a factory job, because she has seen other kids get ran over by garbage trucks". She expresses how the author feels about the topic and provides her opinion as well It is very organized and follows the format and she does include a concluding statement saying Overall the argument is effective because it’s well-intended that people need sweatshops despite all of the issues a sweatshop has.
DeleteLevel 4 she covered everything for a rhetorical analysis and has a lot of good evidence.